Monday, February 12, 2018
To Fellow Sinners, Saved by Grace
My Dearest Family,
We've lost some well-known Christians in the last couple of months, and these losses have left me thinking about not just death, but also about legacy. I've been thinking about what I hope to leave behind someday, specifically what I hope people will say once I'm gone. The revisionist veneration of one (denominationally prominent) Christian has left me very sad and frustrated. As I've seen this fallen human turned into a blameless saint, I've decided to pen some requests for my own funeral some day.
First and foremost: please don't take my sin out of the picture of God's grace.
I beg you: don't reduce me to a caricature of a "good Christian," wiping my sins from earthly record. Yes, God has indeed removed them from me as far as the east from the west (Psa 103:12); I am draped in Christ's righteousness and thus able to stand in his presence. Yet temporal effects remain until the day he returns and makes all things right; and my standing as co-heir with Christ does not erase my time as a slave to sin. And no, of course we don't sin as though we mortals could make grace abound more (Rom 6:1). Ου μη: May it never, ever be!
But those ways in which I've sinned are an important part of the gospel story in my life.
Please do talk about my temper (both before and after I received saving grace). Don't leave out stories of how the "old man" clung to me, even as the Holy Spirit brought change and growth, little by little. Talk about my arrogance, my struggles with pride; then talk about the ways in which Jesus' blood paid the penalty for those sins. Then, and only then, talk about the ways I loved, how God supplied all that I needed to do the good work to which he called me.
Please don't be afraid to share about the ways in which my theology was flawed. Last I checked, ain't nobody Jesus, but Jesus: of course I had some flaws in my theology, this earthly side of heaven. To presume otherwise is absurd; and more than mere bad theology: it's heresy. To preach such nonsense in my passing is slander against me; and worse yet, it's a slander to the gospel itself.
The worst type of heresy is to presume that we none of us have any.
So please, dear ones--preach the gospel at my funeral in its entirety. I must decrease and Christ must increase (Jn 3:30), a daily struggle for us all. Please don't take away from the progress the "new man" made by building me back up into something I wasn't. The gospel plus something is no gospel at all (Gal 1:7), so don't let modern-day Judaizers speak lies at my funeral. Let them in--by all means--I want them to hear the gospel proclaimed. But don't let them (and don't any of you dare be them) spread poisonous half-truths, claiming that my salvation came from my own fleshly works, my own foolish knowledge, or my own feeble faith. My salvation comes from the Lord.
Tell my true testimony--of the many times I sinned by my own volition, but then repented by the Holy Spirit's guidance and received forgiveness by the Lord's mercy--grace upon grace. Tell of how I changed over the years to look more like Jesus, but also to realize just how far from Jesus' holiness I was. Don't rewrite my story, painting me as a larger-than-life, holier-than-thou saint. Please tell God's story--of which I had the honor of being a small part--for the sake of the Kingdom.
Tell the truth in love (Eph 4:15), leaving out neither the enormity of my sin, nor the infinite grace which redeemed me.
In lieu of flowers, I remain,
A fellow sinner, saved by grace.
Friday, February 02, 2018
Free Shipping Fridays: Gender Roles and Norms
Dear Readers,
People have been asking (most with genuine curiosity) why on earth I'm a "centrist" or "robust" complementarian. Why I don't go one way or the other, but camp out in a nebulous middle ground.
I'd like to think it's because I'm seeking to hold seemingly disparate things in tension, the way the gospel often does. And the way only the gospel can.
But I've been accused of being inconsistent, and that's fair. I don't think I am, and I'd like to explain why.
We've been studying 1 Peter 2 in the law student Bible study that I facilitate, and I've been reflecting on "tasting and seeing that the Lord is good" lately. Also, it's getting close to Valentine's Day. So today, I "have" for you a big red box (with a bow!) full of metaphorical chocolates.
Given the subject matter, these little nuggets might not be to everyone's taste. You know--the ones with chili, salt, or other "unusual" flavors in them. A mix of sweet and savory that I personally am drawn toward, but some people (understandably) just don't like. I am not trying to convince anyone to change their Biblically-arrived-upon convictions. This is not that post. I am simply trying to offer a sampling of things that reflect and inform the way I think.
So pick one--at your own risk--and taste and see a little more of the way in which I experience God's goodness, as he is at work redeeming all his people.
Complementarianism is a spectrum:
https://twitter.com/BethanyJenkins/status/955871011873968129
A somewhat(?) egalitarian response that I really resonated with:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/euangelion/2018/01/women-seminary-professors-response-john-piper/
I share this one with a little hesitation, because I do NOT agree with him in other areas of politics and ethnicity. But he articulates my position pretty well:
https://www.wholereason.com/2015/05/why-i-am-a-complemenatarian.html
I also hesitate to link to this one, due to disagreements with the MoS position on a lot of things. A LOT. Culminating in the way other MoS folks actually treat women and minorities, which belies the message of servant leadership. But Aimee Byrd is graciously on point here:
http://www.mortificationofspin.org/mos/housewife-theologian/john-pipers-advice-for-women-in-the-workforce/
A non-believer's wrestling with womanhood and work (language warning):
https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/01/31/baby-book-bathwater/
I believe that Carolyn Custis James is an egalitarian, but she addresses much of my centrist thinking:
http://www.missioalliance.org/john-piper-needs-help-female-seminary-professors/
One woman's journey:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2014/march/accidental-complementarian-.html?share=hVRh8kkuMQIG4%2b31UIgCR%2bYgLSoIYdgT
I wish I could take her classes, "because the church is not a single-parent family." I loved this:
http://blogs.bible.org/engage/sandra_glahn/reflections_of_a_female_seminary_professor
People have been asking (most with genuine curiosity) why on earth I'm a "centrist" or "robust" complementarian. Why I don't go one way or the other, but camp out in a nebulous middle ground.
I'd like to think it's because I'm seeking to hold seemingly disparate things in tension, the way the gospel often does. And the way only the gospel can.
But I've been accused of being inconsistent, and that's fair. I don't think I am, and I'd like to explain why.
We've been studying 1 Peter 2 in the law student Bible study that I facilitate, and I've been reflecting on "tasting and seeing that the Lord is good" lately. Also, it's getting close to Valentine's Day. So today, I "have" for you a big red box (with a bow!) full of metaphorical chocolates.
Given the subject matter, these little nuggets might not be to everyone's taste. You know--the ones with chili, salt, or other "unusual" flavors in them. A mix of sweet and savory that I personally am drawn toward, but some people (understandably) just don't like. I am not trying to convince anyone to change their Biblically-arrived-upon convictions. This is not that post. I am simply trying to offer a sampling of things that reflect and inform the way I think.
So pick one--at your own risk--and taste and see a little more of the way in which I experience God's goodness, as he is at work redeeming all his people.
Complementarianism is a spectrum:
https://twitter.com/BethanyJenkins/status/955871011873968129
A somewhat(?) egalitarian response that I really resonated with:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/euangelion/2018/01/women-seminary-professors-response-john-piper/
I share this one with a little hesitation, because I do NOT agree with him in other areas of politics and ethnicity. But he articulates my position pretty well:
https://www.wholereason.com/2015/05/why-i-am-a-complemenatarian.html
I also hesitate to link to this one, due to disagreements with the MoS position on a lot of things. A LOT. Culminating in the way other MoS folks actually treat women and minorities, which belies the message of servant leadership. But Aimee Byrd is graciously on point here:
http://www.mortificationofspin.org/mos/housewife-theologian/john-pipers-advice-for-women-in-the-workforce/
A non-believer's wrestling with womanhood and work (language warning):
https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/01/31/baby-book-bathwater/
I believe that Carolyn Custis James is an egalitarian, but she addresses much of my centrist thinking:
http://www.missioalliance.org/john-piper-needs-help-female-seminary-professors/
One woman's journey:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2014/march/accidental-complementarian-.html?share=hVRh8kkuMQIG4%2b31UIgCR%2bYgLSoIYdgT
I wish I could take her classes, "because the church is not a single-parent family." I loved this:
http://blogs.bible.org/engage/sandra_glahn/reflections_of_a_female_seminary_professor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)